Jovens em Conflito com a Lei: Os Sentidos das Atividades Socioeducativas nas Unidades Privativas de Liberdade em Goiânia

Abstract

This dissertation under the title: Youth in Conflict with the Law. The Senses of Socio- Educational Activities on Freedom of Private Units in Goiânia had as object of study the educational direction of the Socio-Educational Activities and what their correspondence or denial against the rehabilitation paradigm or socioeducation recommended by the ECA / SINASE. It addresses the most rigid of the five progressive alternatives aimed at youth in conflict with the law: admission to educational establishments, technically named as Private Units of Freedom. Qualitative research and exploratory nature, was guided by the dialectic perspective because you want to seize correspondence and disagreements between the instituting and instituted these settings Educational Institutions imposes itself recognize the bundle of contradictory relationships that permeate under the name of socio-educational. Among the paradigmatic and technical determinations to the daily ritualized actions and directions of activities marking the daily routines of long days under surveillance "educational", the challenges are great. For the constitution of empirical theoretical corpus, we sought contributions in Goffman (1974), Bourdieu (2007), Berger & Berger and Foucault (19--) and prioritized Normative Documents as the ECA, SINASE, State Plan for Socio-Educational Activities of Conduct Adjustment Agreement and the Researcher-Observer Voices, and interviews with General Managers, educational coordinators and teachers of the three units (CIA, CIP and CASE), methodologically submitted narratives to content analysis (Bardin, FRANCO , 2004). The survey revealed that, despite all the theoretical and programmatic advances arising from the ECA (1990) and SINASE (2012) compared to the Children's Code (1979) developed socio-educational activities do not carry and point to the paradigm of rehabilitation or socioeducation. The prison enclosure as a way to control and discipline of bodies and destinations still bear marks and meanings of the Minor Code (1979). What is the fundamental reason: it would be the internalization of entrenched cultural provisions as habitus? From the perspective of hope, we must recognize that the new rules hard-won, for almost three decades, the Socio- Educational Institutions, still ignored, and the daily expressed resistance to change.