O Assédio Moral em uma Organização Pública: Uma leitura da Clínica Psicodinâmica do Trabalho.

Abstract

The work of health professionals from a municipal capital Institution has been marked by a context of decentralization and adjustment in seeking cooperation between peers, but intensification, discontent, socio-professional conflicts in recent years. The form of management and the power has flaws that end up invading the subjectivity of the worker, bringing implications disfavor both the employee and the organization in regard to efficiency and productivity. This context has developed new forms of work organization, influencing their social and professional relationships and their experiences of pleasure and suffering. This thesis aimed to investigate and analyze bullying a group of employees of a Public Institution Municipal starting from the clinical and psychodynamic approach to work. To do so, it sought to diagnose and analyze the existence of processes related to bullying and its causes, specifically in the area of the northwest district of a city in the Midwest of the country, found profiles of likely harassers and harassed relating the real foundation of the object, along the organization s characteristics, experiences of pleasure and workers suffering, the use of subjective mobilization, and his other defensive strategies used by the individual or group to the suffering generated by the constraints at work and manifestation of bullying. Finally, he sought to use the clinic psychodynamics of work through collective discussion space. Some steps have been developed to achieve this goal. The first was based on a documentary analysis, which found the possibility to analyze the suffering of indicators in relation to bullying in the specific department of the human resources department. This first step also involved a willingness to help, through documents with suffering indication. In the second step, it was presented in the form of lectures, presenting concepts, features and profiles of the harasser and harassed, about 300 people were present. Followed by the stage of inviting participants, via telephone, e-mail, those who responded to written questions random and available in talks over who would have lived, or who still lives or experienced bullying at work. And finally made the collective discussion with guiding questions to both groups surveyed, agents and their supervisors. The questions were divided into subcategories, bullying, work organization and subjective mobilization. The meetings had the same development on the methodology, considering the clinical psychodynamics of work. The test results indicate the presence of bullying, highlighting the first group of professionals, with the existence of subjects with stalkers profiles that caused suffering to certain participants. In the second group, it identified bullying of some professionals for supervisors as a means justifiable, the political bias of some agents. As regards the organization of work, considering the experiences of pleasure and pain sent the correlations of the form of management and hierarchy criteria, conflicts in professional social relations of these hierarchies or pairs, overload, lack of recognition the two groups, but emphasizing the subjectivity. Finally, we studied the agents and their supervisors in a particular demographic area. What is established is that the result of the comparison and realization of this insight not only results in changes in language and form of management, but the characteristics of the worker, as both agent and supervisor.