FORMAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO FÍSICA NO BRASIL: novas orientações legais, outras identidades profissionais?

Abstract

This research under the designation "QUALIFICATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN BRAZIL: NEW LEGAL GUIDELINES, OTHER PROFESSIONAL IDENTITIES", it´s inserted in the line of Education Research, Society and Culture. Objectfied to inquire the repercussion of the Resolution CNE / CSE 07/2004, when a full professional qualification of physical education for different areas of operation, it breaks up on the Bachelor and Graduation modalities, viewing two distinct identities. Was defined as the research problem understand under what historical and cultural conditions, occurred this fractionation licensed for school spaces and a bachelor for multiple performance spaces and their impact on professional practice. Guiding question was set up this process "modification" points to the construction and recognition of culturally differentiated identities of professionals? This is a critical and qualitative nature of research documentary based on analysis of the dialectical approach to understanding the research object inserted in a historical totality, that is, in the capitalist neoliberal globalization. The theoretical contributions were sought in Bourdieu (1983), Castellani (1988), Soares (1994), Ventura (2010) and Hall (2015). The empirical corpus was composed of national guiding documents (CNE and MEC), in the Brazilian Congress of Science of Sports (CONBRACE) in the years 2013 and 2015, as also in the scientific production in the field of Physical Education in Brazil between 2004 and 2014: Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte – CBCE, Revista Movimento – UFRGS, Revista Pensar a Prática – UFG (descriptors: professional qualification in Physical Education, Graduation and Bachelor degree in physical education and political and professional impact of Resolution CNE / CSE 07/2004). Was Found 08, 07 and 07 articles respectively. Also provided analysis of this research the production of GTTs Epistemology and Professional Qaulification and the World of Work of the Brazilian Congress of Science of Sports. The conclusions indicate that the new legal guidelines for Physical Education, resulted from neoliberal economic policy in aplly. The Resolution CNE / CES 07/2004 fractionated the field in school and not school, limiting pedagogical qualification. The CONFEF considers school field as "free" inspection. There is no consensus on the dual qualification. The CONFEF supported by legal guidelines, advocating fractionation. The CBCE question the fractional model. This disagreement was not reflected in the academic and scientific means, considering the small number of works presented in the sources indicated by the empirical corpus As for the bachelor and licensed identities, one can consider that the E.F. professional, loads resulting determinations of the new legal guidelines, a new political game in the field of the E.F., a constitutive characterization of the postmodern subject (HALL, 2015), holder identities in construction, mobile and distinct.